Advertisement

Cetuximab Combined With Induction Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine, Followed by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: SWOG 0713

Published:October 25, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2017.10.008

      Abstract

      Background

      Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) is standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Pathologic complete response (pCR) has associated with improved survival. In modern phase III trials of NCRT, pCR ranges from 10% to 20%. Cetuximab improves response in KRAS (KRAS proto-oncogene) wild type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer. S0713 was designed to assess improvement in pCR with additional use of cetuximab with induction chemotherapy and NCRT for locally advanced, KRAS-wt rectal cancer.

      Patients and Methods

      Patient eligibility: stage II to III biopsy-proven, KRAS-wt rectal adenocarcinoma; no bowel obstruction; adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function; performance status of 0 to 2. Target enrollment: 80 patients. Treatment: induction chemotherapy with wCAPOX (weekly capecitabine and oxaliplatin) and cetuximab followed by the same regimen concurrent with radiation (omitting day 15 oxaliplatin). If fewer than 7 pCRs were observed at planned interim analysis after 40 patients received all therapy, the study would close. Eighty eligible patients would provide 90% power given a true pCR rate > 35% at a significance of 0.04. The regimen would lack future interest if pCR probability was ≤ 20%.

      Results

      Between February 2009 and April 2013, 83 patients registered. Four were ineligible and 4 not treated, leaving 75 evaluable for clinical outcomes and toxicity, of whom 65 had surgery. Of 75 patients, 20 had pCR (27%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17%-38%); 19 (25%) had microscopic cancer; 36 (48%) had minor/no response (including 10 without surgery). Three-year disease-free survival was 73% (95% CI, 63%-83%).

      Conclusion

      Our trial did not meet the pCR target of 35%. Toxicity was generally acceptable. This regimen cannot be recommended outside the clinical trial setting.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Colorectal Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sauer R.
        • Becker H.
        • Hohenberger W.
        • et al.
        Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1731-1740
        • Allemani C.
        • Weir H.K.
        • Carreira H.
        • et al.
        Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2).
        Lancet. 2015; 385: 977-1010
        • André T.
        • Boni C.
        • Mounedji-Boudiaf L.
        • et al.
        Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 2343-2351
        • Kuebler J.P.
        • Wieand H.S.
        • O'Connell M.J.
        • et al.
        Oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: results from NSABP C-07.
        J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 2198-2204
        • Gérard J.P.
        • Azria D.
        • Gourgou-Bourgade S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2.
        J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 1638-1644
        • Aschele C.
        • Cionini L.
        • Lonardi S.
        • et al.
        Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial.
        J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 2773-2780
        • Allegra C.J.
        • Yothers G.
        • O'Connell M.J.
        • et al.
        Neoadjuvant 5-FU or capecitabine plus radiation with or without oxaliplatin in rectal cancer patients: a phase III randomized clinical trial.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107 ([published erratum appears in 2015; 107:djv248]): djv248
        • Schmoll H.J.
        • Haustermans K.
        • Price T.J.
        • et al.
        Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin versus capecitabine alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: disease-free survival results at interim analysis.
        J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32 (abstract 3501)
        • Rödel C.
        • Graeven U.
        • Fietkau R.
        • et al.
        Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer (the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study): final results of the multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16: 979-989
        • Khrizman P.
        • Niland J.C.
        • ter Veer A.
        • et al.
        Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy use in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy: a national comprehensive cancer network analysis.
        J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 30-38
        • Abraham N.S.
        • Gossey J.T.
        • Davila J.A.
        • Al-Oudat S.
        • Kramer J.K.
        Receipt of recommended therapy by patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101: 1320-1328
        • Weiser M.R.
        • Zhang Z.
        • Schrag D.
        Locally advanced rectal cancer: time for precision therapeutics.
        Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015; 35: e192-e196
        • Nilsson P.J.
        • van Etten B.
        • Hospers G.A.
        • et al.
        Short-course radiotherapy followed by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer–the RAPIDO trial.
        BMC Cancer. 2013; 13: 279
        • Maas M.
        • Nelemans P.J.
        • Valentini V.
        • et al.
        Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.
        Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11: 835-844
        • Park I.J.
        • You Y.N.
        • Agarwal A.
        • et al.
        Neoadjuvant treatment response as an early response indicator for patients with rectal cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 1770-1776
        • Sauer R.
        • Liersch T.
        • Merkel S.
        • et al.
        Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.
        J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 1926-1933
        • Van Cutsem E.
        • Köhne C.H.
        • Hitre E.
        • et al.
        Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 1408-1417
        • Bokemeyer C.
        • Bondarenko I.
        • Hartmann J.T.
        • et al.
        Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study.
        Ann Oncol. 2011; 22: 1535-1546
        • Rödel C.
        • Grabenbauer G.G.
        • Papadopoulos T.
        • Hohenberger W.
        • Schmoll H.J.
        • Sauer R.
        Phase I/II trial of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiation for rectal cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 3098-3104
        • Green S.J.
        • Dahlberg S.
        Planned versus attained design in phase II clinical trials.
        Stat Med. 1992; 11: 853-862
        • Velenik V.
        • Ocvirk J.
        • Oblak I.
        • Anderluh F.
        A phase II study of cetuximab, capecitabine and radiotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of patients with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010; 36: 244-250
        • Sun P.L.
        • Li B.
        • Ye Q.F.
        Effect of neoadjuvant cetuximab, capecitabine, and radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of a phase II study.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012; 27: 1325-1332
        • Eisterer W.
        • De Vries A.
        • Öfner D.
        • et al.
        Preoperative treatment with capecitabine, cetuximab and radiotherapy for primary locally advanced rectal cancer–a phase II clinical trial.
        Anticancer Res. 2014; 34: 6767-6773
        • Weiss C.
        • Arnold D.
        • Dellas K.
        • et al.
        Preoperative radiotherapy of advanced rectal cancer with capecitabine and oxaliplatin with or without cetuximab: a pooled analysis of three prospective phase I-II trials.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78: 472-478
        • Rödel C.
        • Arnold D.
        • Hipp M.
        • et al.
        Phase I-II trial of cetuximab, capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiotherapy as preoperative treatment in rectal cancer.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 70: 1081-1086
        • Rödel F.
        • Frey B.
        • Multhoff G.
        • Gaipl U.
        Contribution of the immune system to bystander and non-targeted effects of ionizing radiation.
        Cancer Lett. 2015; 356: 105-113
        • Bonner J.A.
        • Harari P.M.
        • Giralt J.
        • et al.
        Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 567-578
        • Zorcolo L.
        • Rosman A.S.
        • Restivo A.
        • et al.
        Complete pathologic response after combined modality treatment for rectal cancer and long-term survival: a meta-analysis.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19: 2822-2832
        • Valentini V.
        • van Stiphout R.G.
        • Lammering G.
        • et al.
        Selection of appropriate end points (pCR vs 2y DFS) for tailoring treatments with prediction models in locally advanced rectal cancer.
        Radiother Oncol. 2015; 114: 302-309
        • Trakarnsanga A.
        • Gonen M.
        • Shia J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of tumor regression grade systems for locally advanced rectal cancer after multimodality treatment.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014; 106: dju248
        • Dewdney A.
        • Cunningham D.
        • Tabernero J.
        • et al.
        Multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial comparing neoadjuvant oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and preoperative radiotherapy with or without cetuximab followed by total mesorectal excision in patients with high-risk rectal cancer (EXPERT-C).
        J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 1620-1627