Advertisement

Adjuvant Management of Pathologic Node–Positive Disease After Definitive Surgery for Clinical T1-2 N0 Rectal Cancer

Published:April 20, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2018.04.001

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Patients with cT1-2N0M0 rectal cancer are often treated with up-front surgical resection, with adjuvant treatment reserved for patients upstaged with pathologic node-positive (pN+) disease at surgery. This study evaluates practice patterns and clinical outcomes when comparing different forms of adjuvant treatment for this patient population.

      Methods

      The National Cancer Data Base was queried for cT1-2N0M0 rectal cancer patients between 2004 and 2015 with postoperative pN+ disease treated without neoadjuvant treatment. Patients were divided into groups receiving observation, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Multivariable logistic regression determined factors associated with receipt of adjuvant treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves compared overall survival (OS), and Cox regression determined patient factors associated with OS.

      Results

      Altogether, 1466 patients met the inclusion criteria; 536 patients (36.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 413 (28.2%) received adjuvant CRT, and 517 (35.3%) were observed postoperatively. Use of adjuvant treatment was associated with superior median OS (124.1 vs. 51.1 months, P < .001), persisting after propensity score matching (124.0 vs. 61.9 months, P < .001), but not between adjuvant CRT versus chemotherapy on subset analysis. Patients with positive surgical margins receiving adjuvant CRT showed a trend toward OS improvement compared to patients managed with chemotherapy (54.9 vs. 47.4 months, P = .10). Increased age, pN2 status, positive margin status, and observation were associated with poorer OS.

      Conclusion

      Most patients found to have pN+ disease after up-front surgery for cT1-2N0 rectal cancer receive adjuvant treatment, which is associated with improved OS. Chemotherapy or CRT are appropriate options, although there was a trend toward higher OS for patients with positive surgical margins receiving CRT.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

      1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines: esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2017. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx. Accessed February 1, 2018.

        • You Y.N.
        • Baxter N.N.
        • Stewart A.
        • Nelson H.
        Is the increasing rate of local excision for stage I rectal cancer in the United States justified? A nationwide cohort study from the National Cancer Database.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 726-733
        • Nascimbeni R.
        • Burgart L.J.
        • Nivatvongs S.
        • Larson D.R.
        Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the colon and rectum.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45: 200-206
        • Carrara A.
        • Mangiola D.
        • Pertile R.
        • et al.
        Analysis of risk factors for lymph nodal involvement in early stages of rectal cancer: when can local excision be considered an appropriate treatment? Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.
        Int J Surg Oncol. 2012; 2012: 438450
        • Fang W.L.
        • Chang S.C.
        • Lin J.K.
        • et al.
        Metastatic potential in T1 and T2 colorectal cancer.
        Hepatogastroenterology. 2005; 52: 1688-1691
        • Nash G.M.
        • Weiser M.R.
        • Guillem J.G.
        • et al.
        Long-term survival after transanal excision of T1 rectal cancer.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52: 577-582
        • Jhaveri K.S.
        • Hosseini-Nik H.
        MRI of rectal cancer: an overview and update on recent advances.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205: W42-W55
        • Tapan Ü.
        • Özbayrak M.
        • Tatlı S.
        MRI in local staging of rectal cancer: an update.
        Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014; 20: 390-398
        • Bipat S.
        • Glas A.S.
        • Slors F.J.
        • Zwinderman A.H.
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Stoker J.
        Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging—a meta analysis.
        Radiology. 2004; 232: 773-783
        • Zhou J.
        • Zhan S.
        • Zhu Q.
        • et al.
        Prediction of nodal involvement in primary rectal carcinoma without invasion to pelvic structures: accuracy of preoperative CT, MR, and DWIBS assessments relative to histopathologic findings.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9: e92779
        • Kim D.J.
        • Kim J.H.
        • Ryu Y.H.
        • et al.
        Nodal Staging of rectal cancer: high resolution MRI vs 18F-FDGPET/CT.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011; 35: 531-534
        • Akeel N.
        • Lan N.
        • Stocchi L.
        • et al.
        Clinically node negative, pathologically node positive rectal cancer patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 21: 49-55
        • Bilimoria K.
        • Stewart A.
        • Winchester D.
        • et al.
        The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15: 683-690
        • Haque W.
        • Verma V.
        • Butler EB.
        • et al.
        Management of pathologic node-positive disease following initial surgery for clinical T1-T2 N0 esophageal cancer: patterns of care and outcomes from the national cancer data base..
        Acta Oncol. 2017; (https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2017.1409435): 1-8
        • Haque W.
        • Verma V.
        • Butler E.B.
        • et al.
        Patterns of care and outcomes of multi-agent versus single-agent chemotherapy as part of multimodal management of low grade glioma.
        J Neurooncol. 2017; 133: 369-375
        • Stahl J.M.
        • Corso C.D.
        • Verma V.
        • et al.
        Trends in stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I small cell lung cancer.
        Lung Cancer. 2017; 103: 11-16
        • McMillan M.T.
        • Ojerholm E.
        • Verma V.
        • et al.
        Radiation treatment time and overall survival in locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017; 98: 1142-1152
        • Sauer R.
        • Becker H.
        • Hohenberger W.
        • et al.
        Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1731-1740
        • Bertsekas D.P.
        • Tseng P.
        Relaxation methods for minimum cost ordinary and generalized network flow problems.
        Oper Res. 1988; 36: 93-114
        • Hansen B.B.
        Full matching in an observational study of coaching for the SAT.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 2004; 99: 609-618
        • Hansen B.B.
        • Klopfer S.O.
        Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows.
        J Comput Graph Stat. 2006; 15: 609-627
        • Hansen B.B.
        • Bowers J.
        Covariate balance in simple, stratified and clustered comparative studies.
        Stat Sci. 2008; 2: 219-236
        • Ho D.E.
        • Imai K.
        • King G.
        • et al.
        Matchit: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference.
        J Stat Softw. 2011; 42 (Available at:)
        • Ho D.
        • Imai K.
        • King G.
        • et al.
        Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference.
        Polit Anal. 2007; 15: 199-236
        • Iacus S.M.
        • King G.
        • Porro G.
        CEM: software for coarsened exact matching.
        J Stat Softw. 2009; 30: 1-27
      2. Thoemmes F. Propensity score matching in SPSS 2012. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.6385. Accessed February 1, 2018.

      3. Bates D. Maechler M. Bolker B. et al., lme4: Linear mixed effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-4 2013. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed February 1, 2018.

      4. Thoemmes F, Liao W. Propensity score matching (with multi level data) using SPSS and R. Paper presented at: Modern Modeling Methods Conference; Storrs, CT; 2013.

        • Austin P.C.
        Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.
        Stat Med. 2009; 28: 3083-3107
        • Kordatou Z.
        • Kountourakis P.
        • Papamichael D.
        Treatment of older patients with colorectal cancer.
        Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2014; 6: 128-140
        • Sanoff H.
        • Carpenter W.
        • Freburger J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of adverse events during 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: a population-based analysis.
        Cancer. 2012; 118: 4309-4320
        • Gunderson L.L.
        • Callister M.
        • Marschke R.
        • et al.
        Stratification of rectal cancer stage for selection of postoperative chemoradiotherapy: current status.
        Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2008; 2: 25-33
        • Nagtegaal I.D.
        • Marijnen C.A.M.
        • Kranenbarg E.K.M.
        • et al.
        Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26: 350-357
        • Sasaki T.
        • Ito Y.
        • Ohue M.
        Postoperative chemotherapy after local resection for high-risk T1 to T2 low rectal cancer: results of a single-arm, multi-institutional, phase ii clinical trial.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2017; 60: 914-921
        • Yamamoto S.
        • Watanabe M.
        • Hasegawa H.
        • et al.
        The risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal carcinoma.
        Hepatogastroentereology. 2004; 51: 998-1000
        • Wolmark N.
        • Wieand H.S.
        • Hyams D.M.
        • et al.
        Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for carcinoma of the rectum: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-02.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 1: 388-396
        • Adam I.J.
        • Mohamdee M.O.
        • Martin J.G.
        • et al.
        Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer.
        Lancet. 1994; 344: 707-711
        • Huh J.W.
        • Lim S.W.
        • Kim H.R.
        • et al.
        Effects of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy on recurrence and survival in stage III rectal cancer.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15: 963-970